On Thursday August 30th,
I attended the Stanley Kubrick exhibition at “The Eye” museum in Amsterdam with
Brandon Ly and ZiXiang Zhang.
Prior to my attendance, I didn’t even know who Stanley Kubrick was other
than hearing from my classmates that he was the movie director behind “2001: A
Space Odyssey,” a famous movie I had heard of before but never watched. I believe that “The Eye” museum had two
primary goals: to educate the visitor about Stanley Kubrick, and to do so in a
pleasurable way. For the sake of
brevity, with this review I will focus on the museum’s goal of providing the
visitor with a pleasurable experience, separate from the content of the
exhibit. I will merely focus on
the layout of the museum, and the interaction with its employees.
I’ll
preface this analysis of the exhibit’s customer experience by first saying that
I really enjoyed the exhibit. I
believe that the museum accomplished its goal of educating the visitor about
Stanley Kubrick and his work - enough to pique visitors’ interest. I came in to the exhibit with zero
prior knowledge of Kubrick or his work; I left the exhibit wanting to watch
about seven of his movies, all in different genres. I left with a great respect for Kubrick as an artist and
movie director, and an understanding of how he helped push the boundaries of
the medium for half of a century from 1950-1999.
Overall,
I believe that the exhibit director provided a very pleasurable experience for
its visitors, but there were clear ways in which he could improve the customer
experience. I’ll break my analysis
down into two sections: the physical layout of the museum, and the employees’
interactions with customers.
The
museum itself is located in a prime location in Amsterdam, directly across the
river behind the Amsterdam Centraal train station. It is a beautiful modern building with a large tower and a massive
poster that can be read from Amsterdam Centraal, a great advertising ploy for
passing tourists. It is very clear
how to get to the museum, as you can just board on any of the ferries that leave
every five minutes. The ride takes
you to within a couple thousand feet of the museum.
After entering and
buying a ticket, it becomes very confusing to find the actual exhibit. Our group spent ten minutes aimlessly searching
the ground level for the entrance; misguidedly believing it was one of the
three theaters on that floor (which were all chained off). It would have been greatly helpful
to find a simple sign, or to have the cashier tell us where the exhibit
started.
The
exhibit itself is organized chronologically by each movie Kubrick directed,
starting with a small space introducing his life and career. As you walk through the exhibit, large
walls, open on both sides, separate each movie. This allows for multiple paths to follow to the subsequent
movie. However, it was not clear
to visitors that this was how the exhibit was organized. It would have been helpful to have the layout listed in the
first room, or in the exhibit program handout. Larger “rooms” were dedicated to Kubrick’s later and more
famous movies. This was a good
decision because more people tend to congregate around films they are familiar
with, such as “2001,” “A Clockwork Orange,” and “The Shining. “
Each
movie section is focused primarily around a large projector screen that plays five-minute
clips of the iconic scenes from each movie. This is a terrific decision, as you cannot get more of a
feel for Kubrick’s work than actually watching some of his best clips, such as
the murder and suicide scene from the Vietnam movie “Full Metal Jacket.” The rest of each section complements
the onscreen video clips. Entering each section, one finds large print on the
wall with the movie title, the year it was made, and a succinct quote from
Kubrick about the principal theme of the movie. This helps provide enough initial context for the unfamiliar
visitor to begin watching the scenes, and to provide the visitor with a frame
of reference to make a deeper analysis.
Throughout each movie’s room, there are sculptures and other artifacts
related to the movie’s production, such as his director’s chair, a sculpture of
the baby from “2001,” pictures of actors, and other short video clips of
interviews with the actors and directors.
Also, the subdued, minimal lighting help focus the visitors on the movie
clips. Overall, the layout of the
exhibit was a thoughtful and well-designed way to showcase Kubrick’s art, and
it helped to frame the visitor’s thoughts.
While
the layout of the exhibit was superb, the customer experience with the museum’s
employees could have definitely been improved in order to provide a pleasurable
experience for the visitor.
When you first walk in, you immediately arrive at the cashier’s desk where
you can buy your ticket. While she
was friendly in her speech, she was distant in her body language – no smiling
or eye contact. She appeared as if
she was not happy with her job and just wanted to leave. She also did not offer us programs or
information sheets about the exhibit, even though they were sitting right next
to her, until Brandon finally asked for one as we were leaving. While searching
for the exhibit we came across some other employees standing around and talking
to each other. We obviously looked
very confused with our tickets in hand walking in places we should not have
been, yet they just stared at us, never offering us any help. Once we finally made our way to the
exhibit, employees at the entrance checking tickets greeted us. They were friendly, and they even
offered to let us leave our oversized backpacks with them at the entrance. This was a very pleasant way to begin
our experience with Stanley Kubrick’s exhibit and it would have been ideal for
all employees to exhibit this level of attentiveness. Lastly, the actual exhibit had several security people walking
around. They were welcome and helped
everyone to feel safe in the dark rooms, allowing us to focus on Kubrick’s work
and not the strangers around us.
Considering
everything about the customer’s experience, from the layout of the exhibit to
the employees in the museum, the Stanley Kubrick exhibit was a very enjoyable experience. Nearly all of the decisions made about
the customer’s experience were the right ones, with only a few instances of
employee behavior detracting from the experience. However, I believe that the exhibit went above and beyond its
goal of providing the visitor with a pleasurable experience because I left the
museum not just a happy man, but also one who wanted to take proactive steps to
experience many of the movies of a director whom I had never heard of before. I would highly recommend the Stanley
Kubrick exhibit to anyone who likes films of any style, as he was a director
who worked in many genres - with something for everyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment