A bag on display in the bathroom of the Museum of Bags and Purses |
I
counted every day of 2008 with a page-a-day purse calendar. My high school
email account was thepurseaholic and I started carrying a handbag in the 6th
grade. Though I’ve become less fanatical about purses, I couldn’t wait to go to
the Museum of Bags and Purses in Amsterdam. The museum splits its permanent
collection over two floors: the third floor houses the bags from the 16th
to 19th centuries while the second floor displays the bags from 1900
to the present day. The guide suggested starting my tour on the third floor and
making my way down from there. I climbed the spiral staircase with high
expectations.
The
collection starts with a couple medieval bags and early tie-on pockets.
Although historically interesting, these bags weren’t an aesthetically exciting
introduction to the collection. Plain and practical quickly turned into more
decorative as the exhibition moved forward in time. The post-1800 purses had
unbelievably fine details, and the museum did a fantastic job of choosing bags
still in good condition. The larger cases would usually contain about ten to twenty
purses of a particular material and time period. Many of the earlier purses
were made of wood, metals or glass beading with pastoral or floral patterns,
but often these tiny details were hard to see under the dim lighting. Many of
these bags had tiny portraits and miniscule metalworking on clasps and chains,
and the poor lighting diminished the full visual effect of this craftsmanship. A
lot of the cases had overhead lighting, and the bags towards the top of the
case would leave the bags below them in shadow. This issue persisted on the
floor with the post-1900 purses as well.
Another
issue that spanned both floors was the lack of clear labels for the individual
purses. Many purses had no indication of date or artist and some entire displays
lacked identification for all of its items. One beautiful matching set of
gloves, fan, purse, snuff case and buttonhook had no label whatsoever. The set
had silver detailing with black satin or silk, but it was harder to enjoy the
set without knowing what decade, or even century, it came from. The second
floor also had a beautiful display of about ten fans, but again no sign (in Dutch
or English) explained where the fans came from or what they were doing next to
the Art Deco purses. Clear
labeling would’ve helped immensely.
The
methodology of showcasing purses based on material and time period that worked
well enough for the first half of the museum fell apart for the post-1900 purses.
The general categories like “Evening Bags” didn’t have the same specificity as
ivory purses within a specified time period. It was hard to view the display as
a unified collection when the bags were only vaguely related to the other bags
in the case. The case of bags by modern (post 1950s) famous designers also
suffered from an overly general organizing idea. If the purses were arranged by
decade or designer you could get a sense of trends or changing fashions, but
the museum used neither time nor artist to organize the wall length case.
Chanel bags sat scattered throughout, and designs from the 70s sat next to bags
from 2011.
As
disappointing as the staging was- the actual bags were fantastic. The cruise-liner-purse,
sitting in a display with other purses shaped like objects, caught my eye. The
very angular black leather bag had a clasp designed to look like the
smokestacks of a ship. As I gazed at the subtle pleating towards the hull, I
realized I had seen this bag in my purse-a-day calendar. As I reexamined the
other bags in the case, I remembered seeing many of them in the calendar as
well. With all these beautiful bags in one place, the museum had the chance to
showcase particular designs or constructions through bright lighting or
separate cases for single remarkable purses, but the museum opted instead for
poorly lit and loosely organized displays. The Museum of Bags and Purses
succeeded in getting a wonderful collection of bags and purses, but it the
staging didn’t amplify the beauty and detailing of the bags. They had the
goods, but didn’t know how to show them.
No comments:
Post a Comment